Thursday, October 25, 2012

Stabilization versus Mobilization deciding how to treat


Location of pain is often not the location to mobilize


Look at L4 in the following video and note when movement occurs at that segment.

For this patient any and all ADL’s that involve the slightest amount of trunk flexion, including but not limited to; dressing, brushing teeth, doing dishes, cooking, and reaching for items all elicit mobility and pain to the L4 region where he has a HNP.  Even if we teach him to perform a full squat to retrieve an item off of the floor he will still elicit motion to L4, secondary to his severe limitation of trunk flexion without compensation (movement) to his lower back.

98% of pain is caused by hypermobility or excessive motion which causes, inflammation, more pain and greater instability as our stabilizing core muscles shut down by 1% for every cubic centimeter of inflammation. It is why surgeons fuse joints, we brace body parts, and doctors cast broken bones.

Unless there is a blunt trauma hypermobility is caused by hypomobility elsewhere. To adequately treat pain we need to stabilize the area hypermobility and mobilize the area or areas of hypomobility.

Recently, I evaluated a shoulder patient who was considering another RTC surgery secondary to pain and inability to play tennis. Like the above LB patient in the movie,  when observing almost every PROM of that upper extremity including, forearm supination, he presented with early and excessive movement (hypermobility) and crepitus at the Glenohumeral  joint. He would compensate for a lack of motion in the forearm and humerus with hypermobility at the GH joint.

Treatment for this patient was to stabilize the shoulder while mobilizing up the kinetic chain. The rationale for this is there will now be attenuation of movement forces through the system and a delay or elimination of motion at the Glenohumeral joint. Post mobilization of the the forearm, there was no motion at the shoulder with full supination only at the forearm where it should be. Post mobilization of the structures around the humerus early motion of the GH joint was delayed or eliminated. 

Note I did not mobilize this patients shoulder but provided stability in the GH joint where he was hypermobile and mobility to the structures of  forearm and humerus that were hypomobile.